I agree; to a degree. But through everything I have learned of silence and words, nothing I can say can convey the meaning he derives.
But. There is nothing in here against attachment “per se” or marriage, but merely a task, or a challenge, to be met. According to OSHO, and my own discovery, awareness in any condition can free one from the bounds of conditioning.
Osho as usual loved contradictions ,,, he said tht marriage is an individual decision and at some other place in his writings he did not opposed marriage. Here he is giving his view point according to the situation
I’ve been a follower of Osho’s words but I respectfully disagree in this occasion I think a thought irresponsible and retrograde to confuse freedom and commitment you can have freedom of choice of with whom to share life or marriage otherwise you will have children without parents who will be a burden to society of a parent they will be orphans of a still living dad who dosent see for them and not go for it. coooool a mr Osho?
@Snotra it is amazing how someone like you who is deeply involved with music and musical bands condemns emotions and feelings so categorically.
Perhaps your statements are the hidden outcry of your conscience who is so sick and tired of the perpetual emotivity and buffoonery that you have chosen to practice.
Although this man might be able to gaze into your soul at the blink of an eye, please do not revile him. This world is enslaved in prejudice because there are too few a people like him.
Osho has gone beyond sex, what so ever he says u might not be able understand, to know the meaning of his language, get rid or your old ideas & conditionings
I believe that his reasoning for his stance on marriage is that if one is married, you are bound to someone and are not free. If the right path unveils itself to you, you may not be able to follow it due to this restriction.
Osho loves paradox. Its part of the beauty of his teachings. Nohing is absolute. You can’t accept anything as true belief. All is only a method of meditation. A way of seeing.
r u on face book? that create so many problems in u every day emotional/phycological and sexual. You have no idea about this man he is free from sex / emotions and almost every thing he had best knowledge check his other vedios and try some books if u can
Are you kidding????
Since you are so quick to judge all these gurus, why not write your own revolutionary book on a paradigm that just might do the trick of awakening this humanity!
All these Gurus lack virtues and have defective paradigms,,,Me first, others second, and God last….argh!! The now that this man and others like, Eckhart Tolle, etc.. speak of is diluted and cowardly view on the infinite nature of the prime mover who is omni present..past, now, and future! This man bases all his opinions from feelings and emotions. He does not use objective, and critical thinking.
these are just some bullshit theories that humans with no proper knowledge of physics, biology and psychology, made up. especially god is a poor theory. read something about abiogenesis.
I agree with You. Both sides of the extremes (as usual) are not healthy. Neither total random freedom, nore enforced marriages.
I’d prefer more concious marriages and concious raising of children of two loving and present parents instead. Communes might be the third step. First people have to take responsibility, for the decision they made. If you have a child, take the responsibility for it YOURself first. THEN the commune might be helpful.
Interesting, BUT he contradicst himself: He says freedom is the highset value. If I decide on my own to be together with somebody and be together with him/her, even if I might lose faith sometimes… thats the higher value o f true love to a human beeing in my eyes he misses. I know this happens rarely. But it is possible. It is the reflexion of Gods love to his creation (children).
I agree; to a degree. But through everything I have learned of silence and words, nothing I can say can convey the meaning he derives.
But. There is nothing in here against attachment “per se” or marriage, but merely a task, or a challenge, to be met. According to OSHO, and my own discovery, awareness in any condition can free one from the bounds of conditioning.
Yes, —
it depends on who is asking…
and the situation…
no fixed ‘rules’ work in a fluid, dynamic universe,
where we are the ‘rule’.
Osho as usual loved contradictions ,,, he said tht marriage is an individual decision and at some other place in his writings he did not opposed marriage. Here he is giving his view point according to the situation
I’ve been a follower of Osho’s words but I respectfully disagree in this occasion I think a thought irresponsible and retrograde to confuse freedom and commitment you can have freedom of choice of with whom to share life or marriage otherwise you will have children without parents who will be a burden to society of a parent they will be orphans of a still living dad who dosent see for them and not go for it. coooool a mr Osho?
this is somehow misunderstood,..you’ll need to know more about (why are two people come together)??I’m disagree with this video..
it is a person or individual opinion or opinions about married,..here.answer!love by one not by million. C if U people get that??
nothing but truth…this is why I’m never gonna get married and I’m happy that I am single.
LOL…
what are we doing all living in pure ignorance when truth is really all that matters to our soul, the source of what gave us this reality.
@Snotra it is amazing how someone like you who is deeply involved with music and musical bands condemns emotions and feelings so categorically.
Perhaps your statements are the hidden outcry of your conscience who is so sick and tired of the perpetual emotivity and buffoonery that you have chosen to practice.
Although this man might be able to gaze into your soul at the blink of an eye, please do not revile him. This world is enslaved in prejudice because there are too few a people like him.
At the end from 9:47 , OSHO explains to the viewer why Tiger Woods, have been able to stay on top of the golf world for such a long time.
God is a RAPEIST!
awesome. but who’s emilardo valdivia ?)
Osho has gone beyond sex, what so ever he says u might not be able understand, to know the meaning of his language, get rid or your old ideas & conditionings
the value of life is created based on its own contradictions. sometimes the best answer to everything is acceptance! lols -emilardo valdivia
I believe that his reasoning for his stance on marriage is that if one is married, you are bound to someone and are not free. If the right path unveils itself to you, you may not be able to follow it due to this restriction.
Osho loves paradox. Its part of the beauty of his teachings. Nohing is absolute. You can’t accept anything as true belief. All is only a method of meditation. A way of seeing.
r u on face book? that create so many problems in u every day emotional/phycological and sexual. You have no idea about this man he is free from sex / emotions and almost every thing he had best knowledge check his other vedios and try some books if u can
Are you kidding????
Since you are so quick to judge all these gurus, why not write your own revolutionary book on a paradigm that just might do the trick of awakening this humanity!
All these Gurus lack virtues and have defective paradigms,,,Me first, others second, and God last….argh!! The now that this man and others like, Eckhart Tolle, etc.. speak of is diluted and cowardly view on the infinite nature of the prime mover who is omni present..past, now, and future! This man bases all his opinions from feelings and emotions. He does not use objective, and critical thinking.
these are just some bullshit theories that humans with no proper knowledge of physics, biology and psychology, made up. especially god is a poor theory. read something about abiogenesis.
I agree with You. Both sides of the extremes (as usual) are not healthy. Neither total random freedom, nore enforced marriages.
I’d prefer more concious marriages and concious raising of children of two loving and present parents instead. Communes might be the third step. First people have to take responsibility, for the decision they made. If you have a child, take the responsibility for it YOURself first. THEN the commune might be helpful.
Interesting, BUT he contradicst himself: He says freedom is the highset value. If I decide on my own to be together with somebody and be together with him/her, even if I might lose faith sometimes… thats the higher value o f true love to a human beeing in my eyes he misses. I know this happens rarely. But it is possible. It is the reflexion of Gods love to his creation (children).
i don’t agree…having so many relationships just for sex would lead to its own share of nuerosis and emtional / psychological problems.
Osho is right, freedom is the highest. religions are all false. all!
One intresting way to look at everything..